[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <adaeix9ff49.fsf@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 08:54:14 -0800
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>, adobriyan@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] memdup_user(): introduce
> I would like to question the use of the gfp argument here;
> copy_from_user sleeps, so you can't use GFP_ATOMIC anyway.
> You can't use GFP_NOFS etc, because the pagefault path will happily do
> things that are equivalent, if not identical, to GFP_KERNEL.
That's a convincing argument, and furthermore, strndup_user() does not
take a gfp parameter, so interface consistency also argues that the
function prototype should just be
void *memdup_user(const void __user *src, size_t len);
(By the way, the len parameter of strndup_user() is declared as long,
which seems strange, since it matches neither the userspace strndup()
nor the kernel kstrndup(), which both use size_t. So using size_t for
memdup_user() and possibly fixing strndup_user() to use size_t as well
seems like the sanest thing)
- R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists