[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1236455509.9151.4.camel@bahia>
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 20:51:49 +0100
From: Greg Kurz <gkurz@...ibm.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>
Cc: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>, roland@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7][v8] Container-init signal semantics
On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 20:43 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> case LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_HALT:
> - kernel_halt();
> - unlock_kernel();
> - do_exit(0);
> + if (power_off_pid_ns(current->nsproxy->pid_ns)) {
> + kernel_halt();
> + unlock_kernel();
> + do_exit(0);
> + }
Even if current will get SIGKILLed when zap_pid_ns_processes() is
called, I see no reason it doesn't call do_exit(0).
> break;
>
> case LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_POWER_OFF:
> - kernel_power_off();
> - unlock_kernel();
> - do_exit(0);
> + if (power_off_pid_ns(current->nsproxy->pid_ns)) {
> + kernel_power_off();
> + unlock_kernel();
> + do_exit(0);
> + }
Same.
> break;
>
--
Gregory Kurz gkurz@...ibm.com
Software Engineer @ IBM/Meiosys http://www.ibm.com
Tel +33 (0)534 638 479 Fax +33 (0)561 400 420
"Anarchy is about taking complete responsibility for yourself."
Alan Moore.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists