lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090307222511.GA10727@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Sat, 7 Mar 2009 14:25:11 -0800
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	manfred@...orfullife.com, Nadia.Derbey@...l.net,
	miltonm@...tin.ibm.com, mingo@...e.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	peterz@...radead.org, lnxninja@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, efault@....de,
	riel@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH] make idr_remove_all() do removal -before- free_layer()

The following patch fixes a problem in the IDR system, where an
idr_remove_all() hands a data element to call_rcu() (via free_layer())
before making that data element inaccessible to new readers.  This is
very bad, and results in readers still having a reference to this data
element at the end of the grace period.  Tests on large machines that
concurrently map and unmap user-space memory within the same multithreaded
process result in crashes within about five minutes.  Applying this
patch increases the kernel's longevity to the three-to-eight-hour range.

There appear to be other similar problems in idr_get_empty_slot() and
sub_remove(), but I fixed the easy one in idr_remove_all() first.  It is
therefore no surprise that failures still occur.

(Yes, and I did look at the relevant patch last year without spotting
this one.  Goes to show the value of testing as well as code review,
I guess...)

Nadia, Manfred, any thoughts?

Located-by: Milton Miller II <miltonm@...tin.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Milton Miller II <miltonm@...tin.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---

diff --git a/lib/idr.c b/lib/idr.c
index c11c576..dab4bca 100644
--- a/lib/idr.c
+++ b/lib/idr.c
@@ -449,6 +449,7 @@ void idr_remove_all(struct idr *idp)
 
 	n = idp->layers * IDR_BITS;
 	p = idp->top;
+	rcu_assign_pointer(idp->top, NULL);
 	max = 1 << n;
 
 	id = 0;
@@ -467,7 +468,6 @@ void idr_remove_all(struct idr *idp)
 			p = *--paa;
 		}
 	}
-	rcu_assign_pointer(idp->top, NULL);
 	idp->layers = 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(idr_remove_all);

----- End forwarded message -----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ