linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] /dev/time for Linux, inspired by Plan 9

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090307055404.GA549@kroah.com>
Date:	Fri, 6 Mar 2009 21:54:04 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	"J.R. Mauro" <jrm8005@...il.com>
Cc:	Christopher Brannon <cmbrannon@....net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] /dev/time for Linux, inspired by Plan 9

On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:43:43AM -0500, J.R. Mauro wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 09:06:46PM -0600, Christopher Brannon wrote:
> >> Under Plan 9 from Bell Labs, one queries or sets the system clock by
> >> reading or writing text strings to a special file named /dev/time.
> >> I implemented such a facility for Linux.  A read of /dev/time produces
> >> four decimal numbers: epoch seconds, nanoseconds since start of epoch,
> >> jiffies since boot, and jiffies per second.  Writing a decimal number to
> >> /dev/time sets the system clock to the given number of epoch seconds.
> >> Anyone who is permitted to write to /dev/time may set the clock.
> >> Granting this privilege becomes as easy as modifying groups and file
> >> permissions.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Christopher Brannon <cmbrannon@....net>
> >
> > I'm starting to see a few plan9 specific devices being proposed
> > recently, with one making it into the staging tree recently (the p9auth
> > interface).  Should we just start lumping them all together so to keep
> > them in one place?  drivers/plan9/ ?
> 
> That might be a good idea, assuming it doesn't start up a flamewar.

I don't think if we keep it all in one place, it would.

> The Glendix folks are working hard to get a lot of these device files
> and filesystems implemented and it would be nice to see them have a
> place to feel welcome.
> 
> Would it be very involved to get a little sandbox for these things?

drivers/plan9 looks like a nice place to me, any objections?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/