[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440903062331j22aa57c7r93c84da880a8e572@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 23:31:17 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] igb: fix kexec with igb
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Jesse Brandeburg
<jesse.brandeburg@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Impact: could probe igb
>>
>> Found one system with 82575EB, in the kernel that is kexeced, probe igb
>> failed with -2.
>>
>> it looks like the same behavior happened on forcedeth.
>>
>> try to check system_state to make sure if put it on D3
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
>>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/igb/igb_main.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> I see the point of the patch, but I know for a fact that ixgbe when
> enabled for MSI-X also doesn't work with kexec.
>
> so my questions are:
> are you going to change every driver?
i tend to only change driver that i have related HW.
> why can't this be fixed in core kernel code instead?
will check it.
> Shouldn't pci_enable_device take it out of D3?
> Or maybe it should be taken out of D3 immediately if someone tries to
> ioremap any of the BARx registers?
looks like second kernel can not detect the state any more.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists