linux-kernel - [RFC][PATCH][5/8] PCI PM: Consistently use variable name "error" for pm call return values

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200903071124.17076.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Sat, 7 Mar 2009 11:24:15 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH][5/8] PCI PM: Consistently use variable name "error" for pm call return values

From: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>

I noticed two functions use a variable "i" to store the return value of PM
function calls while the rest of the file uses "error". As "i" normally
indicates a counter of some sort it seems better to keep this consistent.

Signed-off-by: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
---
 drivers/pci/pci-driver.c |   20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
@@ -352,17 +352,17 @@ static int pci_legacy_suspend(struct dev
 {
 	struct pci_dev * pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev);
 	struct pci_driver * drv = pci_dev->driver;
-	int i = 0;
+	int error = 0;
 
 	if (drv && drv->suspend) {
 		pci_power_t prev = pci_dev->current_state;
 
 		pci_dev->state_saved = false;
 
-		i = drv->suspend(pci_dev, state);
-		suspend_report_result(drv->suspend, i);
-		if (i)
-			return i;
+		error = drv->suspend(pci_dev, state);
+		suspend_report_result(drv->suspend, error);
+		if (error)
+			return error;
 
 		if (pci_dev->state_saved)
 			goto Fixup;
@@ -385,20 +385,20 @@ static int pci_legacy_suspend(struct dev
  Fixup:
 	pci_fixup_device(pci_fixup_suspend, pci_dev);
 
-	return i;
+	return error;
 }
 
 static int pci_legacy_suspend_late(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state)
 {
 	struct pci_dev * pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev);
 	struct pci_driver * drv = pci_dev->driver;
-	int i = 0;
+	int error = 0;
 
 	if (drv && drv->suspend_late) {
-		i = drv->suspend_late(pci_dev, state);
-		suspend_report_result(drv->suspend_late, i);
+		error = drv->suspend_late(pci_dev, state);
+		suspend_report_result(drv->suspend_late, error);
 	}
-	return i;
+	return error;
 }
 
 static int pci_legacy_resume_early(struct device *dev)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/