[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090308151710.637fe280@mjolnir.ossman.eu>
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 15:17:10 +0100
From: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@...eus.cx>
To: avorontsov@...mvista.com
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
Liu Dave <DaveLiu@...escale.com>, sdhci-devel@...t.drzeus.cx,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] sdhci: Add support for hosts with strict 32 bit
addressing
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 20:48:45 +0300
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com> wrote:
> But I see the point of confusion... Instead of teaching
> "SDHCI core" to work with 32 bits hosts, we'd better handle this
> in the eSDHC part, in the accessors.
>
> This is relatively trivial and should not cause much overhead
> (at least when using DMA), just a small state machine with
> the xfer mode register shadowed in software (plus, notice that
> this also handles BLOCK_SIZE, as I promised in another email):
>
Me like. Keeps my life a lot saner. :)
Just be aware that there is a remote risk of breakage as people hacking
on sdhci-core won't be aware of esdhc's, let's call it unique,
behaviour. Some testing now and then on your part would be prudent. :)
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
encryption.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists