| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <49B32B63.9030106@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 20:20:19 -0600 From: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com> To: Adrian McMenamin <lkmladrian@...il.com> CC: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: printk issue - bug? Adrian McMenamin wrote: > 2009/3/7 Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>: > >> ie offset is a 64-bit type but the printk format for it is %x, which >> presumably only consumes 32 bits on SH4? Seems like your code is buggy >> and you ignored a compiler warning about printk format mismatch? >> >> - R. >> > > Yes, loff_t is a long long but why did it work in the first line and > not the second? It didn't. You didn't print loff_t in the first printk, and the variable size mismatch corrupted the next value being printed in the second one. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists