[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090308223304.GB11513@kroah.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 15:33:04 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jouni Malinen <j@...fi>, Sujith <m.sujith@...il.com>,
Sujith <Sujith.Manoharan@...eros.com>,
Senthilkumar Balasubramanian
<Senthilkumar.Balasubramanian@...eros.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vasanth@...eros.com>
Subject: Re: Staging, place holder for better company/community development
model
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 01:07:45PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 23:14 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > If we should take this approach -- should we send patches for wireless
> > staging to John, or Greg? It would still be "crap" so I don't expect
> > John to accept to help maintain crap but what if its crap with a clear
> > defined path to un-crap land?
>
> FWIW, I would MUCH prefer if the staging crap never passed any official
> mailing lists.
What do you mean by this? You don't ever want to see any staging
patches on any mailing lists? That doesn't sound helpful.
I can provide a simple procmail rule if you really don't like this kind
of thing, but that seems pretty extreme...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists