linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] UML on UML fixed: it did not start

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 8 Mar 2009 14:49:52 +0800
From:	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	Renzo Davoli <renzo@...unibo.it>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UML on UML fixed: it did not start

On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 08:49:22PM +0100, Renzo Davoli wrote:
>It is currently impossible to run a user-mode linux machine inside another user-mode 
>linux (UML on UML). It breaks after a few instructions. When it tries to check
>whether SYSEMU is installed (the inner) UML receives an inconsistent result 
>(from the outer UML).
>
>This is the output of a broken attempt:
>$ ./linux mem=256m ubd0=cow
>Locating the bottom of the address space ... 0x0
>Locating the top of the address space ... 0xc0000000
>Core dump limits :
>        soft - 0
>        hard - NONE
>Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...OK
>Checking ptrace new tags for syscall emulation...unsupported
>Checking syscall emulation patch for ptrace...check_sysemu : expected SIGTRAP, got status = 256
>$
>
>The problem is the following:
>PTRACE_SYSCALL/SINGLESTEP is currently managed inside arch_ptrace for ARCH=um.
>
>PTRACE_SYSEMU/SUSEMU_SINGLESTEP is not captured in arch_ptrace's switch, therefore
>it is erroneously passed back to ptrace_request (in kernel/ptrace).
>
>This simple patch simply forces ptrace to return an error on PTRACE_SYSEMU/SUSEMU_SINGLESTEP
>as it is unsupported on ARCH=um, and fixes the problem.
>
>I posted the same patch one month ago. I just tested it again against the latest kernel.
>
>	renzo

Thanks, renzo! Good work!

>
>Signed-off-by: Renzo Davoli <renzo@...unibo.it>
>---
>diff -Naur linux-2.6.29-rc7/arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c linux-2.6.29-rc7-umluml/arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c
>--- linux-2.6.29-rc7/arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c	2008-12-25 00:26:37.000000000 +0100
>+++ linux-2.6.29-rc7-umluml/arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c	2009-03-06 20:27:51.000000000 +0100
>@@ -64,6 +64,11 @@
> 		ret = poke_user(child, addr, data);
> 		break;
> 
>+	case PTRACE_SYSEMU:
>+	case PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP:
>+		ret=-EIO;
>+		break;
>+

I think this is OK. Please feel free to add my reviewed-by:

Reviewed-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>

Jeff, what do you think?

-- 
Do what you love, f**k the rest! F**k the regulations!
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/