| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <49B377D2.8030108@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 23:46:26 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: remove smp_apply_quirks()/smp_checks()
Impact: cleanup to make 64 bit don't compile those related code
those code is only applied to intel pentium and amd k7 32 bit cpus.
move those check to intel_init()/amd_init() for 32bit
so 64 bit will not include those code
also change to use cpu_index check to see if need emit warning.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 25 ++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 78 --------------------------------------------
3 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#include <asm/io.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>
#include <asm/apic.h>
+#include <asm/cpu.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
# include <asm/numa_64.h>
@@ -141,6 +142,55 @@ static void __cpuinit init_amd_k6(struct
}
}
+static void __cpuinit amd_k7_smp_check(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ /* calling is from identify_secondary_cpu() ? */
+ if (c->cpu_index == boot_cpu_id)
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * Certain Athlons might work (for various values of 'work') in SMP
+ * but they are not certified as MP capable.
+ */
+ /* Athlon 660/661 is valid. */
+ if ((c->x86_model == 6) && ((c->x86_mask == 0) ||
+ (c->x86_mask == 1)))
+ goto valid_k7;
+
+ /* Duron 670 is valid */
+ if ((c->x86_model == 7) && (c->x86_mask == 0))
+ goto valid_k7;
+
+ /*
+ * Athlon 662, Duron 671, and Athlon >model 7 have capability
+ * bit. It's worth noting that the A5 stepping (662) of some
+ * Athlon XP's have the MP bit set.
+ * See http://www.heise.de/newsticker/data/jow-18.10.01-000 for
+ * more.
+ */
+ if (((c->x86_model == 6) && (c->x86_mask >= 2)) ||
+ ((c->x86_model == 7) && (c->x86_mask >= 1)) ||
+ (c->x86_model > 7))
+ if (cpu_has_mp)
+ goto valid_k7;
+
+ /* If we get here, not a certified SMP capable AMD system. */
+
+ /*
+ * Don't taint if we are running SMP kernel on a single non-MP
+ * approved Athlon
+ */
+ WARN_ONCE(1, "WARNING: This combination of AMD"
+ "processors is not suitable for SMP.\n");
+ if (!test_taint(TAINT_UNSAFE_SMP))
+ add_taint(TAINT_UNSAFE_SMP);
+
+valid_k7:
+ ;
+#endif
+}
+
static void __cpuinit init_amd_k7(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
u32 l, h;
@@ -175,6 +225,8 @@ static void __cpuinit init_amd_k7(struct
}
set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_K7);
+
+ amd_k7_smp_check(c);
}
#endif
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/ds.h>
#include <asm/bugs.h>
+#include <asm/cpu.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
#include <asm/topology.h>
@@ -139,6 +140,28 @@ static void __cpuinit trap_init_f00f_bug
}
#endif
+static void __cpuinit intel_smp_check(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ /* calling is from identify_secondary_cpu() ? */
+ if (c->cpu_index == boot_cpu_id)
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * Mask B, Pentium, but not Pentium MMX
+ */
+ if (c->x86 == 5 &&
+ c->x86_mask >= 1 && c->x86_mask <= 4 &&
+ c->x86_model <= 3) {
+ /*
+ * Remember we have B step Pentia with bugs
+ */
+ WARN_ONCE(1, "WARNING: SMP operation may be unreliable"
+ "with B stepping processors.\n");
+ }
+#endif
+}
+
static void __cpuinit intel_workarounds(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
unsigned long lo, hi;
@@ -215,6 +238,8 @@ static void __cpuinit intel_workarounds(
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ
numaq_tsc_disable();
#endif
+
+ intel_smp_check(c);
}
#else
static void __cpuinit intel_workarounds(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -114,10 +114,6 @@ EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(cpu_info);
atomic_t init_deasserted;
-
-/* Set if we find a B stepping CPU */
-static int __cpuinitdata smp_b_stepping;
-
#if defined(CONFIG_NUMA) && defined(CONFIG_X86_32)
/* which logical CPUs are on which nodes */
@@ -271,8 +267,6 @@ static void __cpuinit smp_callin(void)
cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid, cpu_callin_mask);
}
-static int __cpuinitdata unsafe_smp;
-
/*
* Activate a secondary processor.
*/
@@ -340,76 +334,6 @@ notrace static void __cpuinit start_seco
cpu_idle();
}
-static void __cpuinit smp_apply_quirks(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
-{
- /*
- * Mask B, Pentium, but not Pentium MMX
- */
- if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL &&
- c->x86 == 5 &&
- c->x86_mask >= 1 && c->x86_mask <= 4 &&
- c->x86_model <= 3)
- /*
- * Remember we have B step Pentia with bugs
- */
- smp_b_stepping = 1;
-
- /*
- * Certain Athlons might work (for various values of 'work') in SMP
- * but they are not certified as MP capable.
- */
- if ((c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD) && (c->x86 == 6)) {
-
- if (num_possible_cpus() == 1)
- goto valid_k7;
-
- /* Athlon 660/661 is valid. */
- if ((c->x86_model == 6) && ((c->x86_mask == 0) ||
- (c->x86_mask == 1)))
- goto valid_k7;
-
- /* Duron 670 is valid */
- if ((c->x86_model == 7) && (c->x86_mask == 0))
- goto valid_k7;
-
- /*
- * Athlon 662, Duron 671, and Athlon >model 7 have capability
- * bit. It's worth noting that the A5 stepping (662) of some
- * Athlon XP's have the MP bit set.
- * See http://www.heise.de/newsticker/data/jow-18.10.01-000 for
- * more.
- */
- if (((c->x86_model == 6) && (c->x86_mask >= 2)) ||
- ((c->x86_model == 7) && (c->x86_mask >= 1)) ||
- (c->x86_model > 7))
- if (cpu_has_mp)
- goto valid_k7;
-
- /* If we get here, not a certified SMP capable AMD system. */
- unsafe_smp = 1;
- }
-
-valid_k7:
- ;
-}
-
-static void __cpuinit smp_checks(void)
-{
- if (smp_b_stepping)
- printk(KERN_WARNING "WARNING: SMP operation may be unreliable"
- "with B stepping processors.\n");
-
- /*
- * Don't taint if we are running SMP kernel on a single non-MP
- * approved Athlon
- */
- if (unsafe_smp && num_online_cpus() > 1) {
- printk(KERN_INFO "WARNING: This combination of AMD"
- "processors is not suitable for SMP.\n");
- add_taint(TAINT_UNSAFE_SMP);
- }
-}
-
/*
* The bootstrap kernel entry code has set these up. Save them for
* a given CPU
@@ -423,7 +347,6 @@ void __cpuinit smp_store_cpu_info(int id
c->cpu_index = id;
if (id != 0)
identify_secondary_cpu(c);
- smp_apply_quirks(c);
}
@@ -1198,7 +1121,6 @@ void __init native_smp_cpus_done(unsigne
pr_debug("Boot done.\n");
impress_friends();
- smp_checks();
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
setup_ioapic_dest();
#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists