[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1236507594.22914.3641.camel@twins>
Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 11:19:54 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Balazs Scheidler <bazsi@...abit.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: scheduler oddity [bug?]
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 10:58 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> The below cures it, but is only a demo hack.
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index 8e2558c..85f9ced 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -1712,11 +1712,15 @@ static void enqueue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wakeup)
>
> static void dequeue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep)
> {
> + u64 limit = sysctl_sched_migration_cost;
> + u64 runtime = p->se.sum_exec_runtime - p->se.prev_sum_exec_runtime;
> +
> if (sleep && p->se.last_wakeup) {
> update_avg(&p->se.avg_overlap,
> p->se.sum_exec_runtime - p->se.last_wakeup);
> p->se.last_wakeup = 0;
> - }
Wouldn't something like the below be more suited:
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 89e2ca0..94c8b02 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2501,7 +2501,7 @@ static void __sched_fork(struct task_struct *p)
p->se.prev_sum_exec_runtime = 0;
p->se.nr_migrations = 0;
p->se.last_wakeup = 0;
- p->se.avg_overlap = 0;
+ p->se.avg_overlap = sysctl_sched_migration_cost;
p->se.start_runtime = 0;
p->se.avg_wakeup = sysctl_sched_wakeup_granularity;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists