[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090309095411.GL11787@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 10:54:11 +0100
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, martin.petersen@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix memory leak in bio_clone()
On Mon, Mar 09 2009, Li Zefan wrote:
> >>> as the mempool mask. So the leak will not occur, but it does mean that
> >>> it isn't honoring the gfp_mask passed in to bio_clone(), which is the
> >> I noticed there was a patch to do this, and seems you planed to merge
> >> it into .29?
> >>
> >> "[PATCH] Add gfp_mask to bio_integrity_clone()"
> >>
> >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/30/11
> >
> > Hmm strange, apparently that never got queued up and I had forgotten all
> > about that issue until your email. I'll add it asap.
> >
>
> I found bio_integrity_clone() is not using the gfp_mask passed by bio_clone(),
> so I googled it in LKML before I fix it. :)
I've got both patches queued up now:
http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-2.6-block.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-linus
> >>> first bug. The second bug is that it should be using its own bioset, as
> >>> it is illegal to do multiple __GFP_WAIT allocations on a single mempool
> >>> and always expect progress.
> >
> > That one still stands.
> >
>
> Yes, and I'd leave it to you or Martin. ;)
I'll let Martin sort that out, it can easily wait for the next release.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists