[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49B5534D.6090109@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 10:35:09 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: put initial_pg_tables into .bss -v4
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> Impact: cleanup
>>
>> Don't use ram after _end blindly for pagetables. aka init pages is before _end
>> put those pg table into .bss
>>
>> v2: keep initial page table up to 512M only.
>> v4: put initial page tables just before _end
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
>>
>
> I still feel that this is a movement in *EXACTLY* the wrong direction,
> as it is deliberately intended to prevent a general allocator for
> anything that needs to be dynamic very early on. I still think that
> makes a lot more sense.
it just estimates initial_pg_tables size, and make _end a little bigger (1M), so boot loader could have idea of correct size of vmlinux aka the uncompressed size of in kernel.
I assume brk patches could estimate the extra size that it needs too.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists