[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0903091307570.27253@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 13:13:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch -mm] cpusets: add memory_slab_hardwall flag
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Again these are fastpath modifications.
>
The nature of the change requires the logic to be placed in the fastpath
to determine whether a cpu slab's node is allowed by the allocating task's
cpuset.
You have previously stated that you would prefer that this feature be
tunable from userspace. This patch adds the `memory_slab_hardwall' cpuset
flag which defaults to off.
> Scanning the partial list for matching nodes is an expensive operation.
>
It depends on how long you scan for a matching node, but again: this
should be assumed by the user if the option has been enabled.
> Adding RCU into the fast paths is also another big worry.
>
This could be mitigated by adding a PF_SLAB_HARDWALL flag similiar to
PF_SPREAD_PAGE and PF_SPREAD_SLAB. I'd prefer not to add additional
cpuset-specific task flags, but this would address your concern.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists