[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <B4ED8DE8E195E84A872496A085BC07822F67@exchange01.corp.win-professional.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 20:51:57 +0100
From: "Morten P.D. Stevens" <mstevens@...-professional.com>
To: "Manfred Knick" <Manfred.Knick@...nline.de>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Re: [PATCH] xen: core dom0 support
Hi,
> Do you perhaps have the corresponding figures regarding e.g. VMware
ESX(i)
> available?
Yes.
HDD: XEN | KVM | ESXi
Write: 110 MB/s | 60 MB/s | 35 MB/s
Read: 130 MB/s | 80 MB/s | 160 MB/s
Network Performance: (download an 4 GB iso image from apache webserver)
XEN | KVM | ESXi
download Speed: 105 MB/s | 50 MB/s | 43 MB/s
Overall, xen is the most powerful virtualization platform on our IBM
servers.
Best regards,
Morten
-----Original Message-----
From: linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org
[mailto:linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Manfred Knick
Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 3:25 PM
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: core dom0 support
Morten P.D. Stevens <mstevens <at> win-professional.com> writes:
> Here some benchmarks with Citrix XenServer 5.0 vs KVM with linux and
windows
guests on an IBM x3400 server:
Thanks!
Just out of curiosity, to complete your appreciated impression:
Do you perhaps have the corresponding figures regarding e.g. VMware
ESX(i)
available?
Thanks in advance!
Manfred
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists