linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] PCI core learns hotplug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <19f34abd0903091328q4471bb3he0c6e07fa32a6a1f@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 9 Mar 2009 21:28:00 +0100
From:	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
To:	Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
Cc:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, xyzzy@...akeasy.org, djwong@...ibm.com,
	shimada-yxb@...st.nec.co.jp, rjw@...k.pl,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] PCI core learns hotplug

2009/3/9 Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>:
>> It reproduces reliably if I do this:
>>
>> $ while true; do echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:00\:00.0/remove; done
>
> I was going to ask for lspci -v output so that I could see what
> device 0000:00:00.0 might be, but I was able to reproduce
> something similar on my machine.
>
> Can I ask why you're doing the above with a while loop? Just to
> torture the code? Or something else?

Yes, purely for the purpose of torture ;-)

I also found one more use-after-free error using kmemcheck:

[  263.258025] WARNING: kmemcheck: Caught 8-bit read from freed memory
(ffff88003d8f315c)
[  263.266131] 80e1803f0088ffff20d67b81ffffffff0000000000000000000000000d000000
[  263.275104]  f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f
[  263.284053]                                                          ^
[  263.290696]
[  263.292303] Pid: 881, comm: udevd Not tainted 2.6.29-rc6 #361 945P-A
[  263.298770] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff811eb501>]  [<ffffffff811eb501>]
kobject_put+0x11/0x60
[  263.306938] RSP: 0018:ffff88003f8bde60  EFLAGS: 00010282
[  263.312367] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff88003d8f3120 RCX: 0000000000000000
[  263.319616] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000003 RDI: ffff88003d8f3120
[  263.326865] RBP: ffff88003f8bde70 R08: 00000000002ec000 R09: 0000000000000000
[  263.334114] R10: ffff88003d95fdc0 R11: 0000000000000010 R12: ffff88003d946ac0
[  263.341362] R13: ffff88003f80a908 R14: ffff88003f80a908 R15: ffff88003f8adf00
[  263.348613] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8800019f1000(0063)
knlGS:00000000f7d6c700
[  263.356884] CS:  0010 DS: 002b ES: 002b CR0: 000000008005003b
[  263.362747] CR2: ffff88003f806ea0 CR3: 000000003e44a000 CR4: 00000000000006a0
[  263.369995] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[  263.377246] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff4ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[  263.384494]  [<ffffffff81125048>] sysfs_schedule_callback_work+0x28/0x40
[  263.391378]  [<ffffffff81055510>] run_workqueue+0x70/0x130
[  263.397049]  [<ffffffff81055677>] worker_thread+0xa7/0x120
[  263.402720]  [<ffffffff810593d9>] kthread+0x49/0x90
[  263.407784]  [<ffffffff8100d45a>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
[  263.412935]  [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
[  281.464381] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 01

This is how I triggered it:

# echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:00\:00.0/remove
# echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/rescan
# echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/rescan
# echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:00\:00.0/remove

The line numbers:

$ addr2line -e vmlinux -i ffffffff811eb501 ffffffff81125048
lib/kobject.c:589
fs/sysfs/file.c:677

586 void kobject_put(struct kobject *kobj)
587 {
588         if (kobj) {
589                 if (!kobj->state_initialized)
590                         WARN(1, KERN_WARNING "kobject: '%s' (%p): is not "
591                                "initialized, yet kobject_put() is being "
592                                "called.\n", kobject_name(kobj), kobj);
593                 kref_put(&kobj->kref, kobject_release);
594         }
595 }

669 static void sysfs_schedule_callback_work(struct work_struct *work)
670 {
671         struct sysfs_schedule_callback_struct *ss = container_of(work,
672                         struct sysfs_schedule_callback_struct, work);
673
674         (ss->func)(ss->data);
675         kobject_put(ss->kobj);
676         module_put(ss->owner);
677         kfree(ss);
678 }

(The short story: the ss->kobj was already freed when this function was called.)

Hope this helps :-)


Vegard

-- 
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
	-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/