[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x494oy2ctpq.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:44:01 -0400
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Michael Kerrisk <michael.kerrisk@...glemail.com>
Cc: linux-aio <linux-aio@...ck.org>, michael.kerrisk@...il.com,
zach.brown@...cle.com, bcrl@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] man-pages: add documentation about the memlock implications of io_setup
Michael Kerrisk <michael.kerrisk@...glemail.com> writes:
> [RESEND: Really CC+=Vegard Nossum, this time, and += mtk.manpages@, as well]
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Note that my address for man-pages is mtk.manpages@...il.com.
Sorry about that!
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 4:59 AM, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch, against man-pages-3.19, adds verbiage surrounding the newly
>> proposed accounting of pinned aio completion ring pages against the
>> memlock rlimit. It also fixes up a few references to aio_context_t
>> (which should be io_context_t). Sorry for conflating the two, I can
>> break it apart if needed.
>
> Breaking apart really would be better. Could you resubmit (to
> mtk.manpages@, and CC linux-man@...r) please?
Sure thing. I'll address your question when I resubmit.
Thanks!
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists