[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090310090117.GC20716@alberich.amd.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:01:17 +0100
From: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...nel.org>,
x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git-pull -tip] x86: cpu architecture debug code
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 12:42:49PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 12:19 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > The following changes since commit cb553adb4e83bc5314b5a0c397e546a215b19307:
> > Ingo Molnar (1):
> > Merge branch 'tracing/printk'
> >
> > are available in the git repository at:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaswinder/linux-2.6-tip-cpu.git master
> >
> > Jaswinder Singh Rajput (1):
> > x86: cpu architecture debug code
> >
I still doubt that this is going to be useful (I don't see use cases for it).
Nevertheless I have some comments.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> index c381330..6427a84 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ endif
>
> obj-y := intel_cacheinfo.o addon_cpuid_features.o
> obj-y += proc.o capflags.o powerflags.o common.o
> -obj-y += vmware.o hypervisor.o
> +obj-y += vmware.o hypervisor.o cpu_debug.o
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_X86_32) += bugs.o cmpxchg.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_X86_64) += bugs_64.o
There is no kernel config option and this code will always be
compiled in. Why?
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu_debug.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu_debug.c
> new file mode 100755
> index 0000000..e50d73b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu_debug.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,692 @@
...
> +static int cpu_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> +{
> + struct cpu_private *priv = seq->private;
> +
> + if (priv == NULL)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + switch (cpu_base[priv->type].flag) {
> + case CPU_TSS:
> + smp_call_function_single(priv->cpu, print_stdreg, seq, 1);
> + break;
> + case CPU_CR:
> + smp_call_function_single(priv->cpu, print_cr, seq, 1);
> + break;
> + case CPU_DT:
> + smp_call_function_single(priv->cpu, print_dt, seq, 1);
> + break;
> + default:
> + print_msr(seq, priv->cpu, cpu_base[priv->type].flag);
> + break;
> + }
> + seq_printf(seq, "\n");
(As one example.) Please don't print empty lines.
General thoughts/questions:
Your code is not cpu-hotpluggable. The complete debugfs subtree shows up
for all CPUs - including CPUs that are offline. Was this your intention?
How does this (especially dumping of register state) fit into other
kernel debugging facilities, ie.
- kgdb
- sysrq
Regards,
Andreas
--
Operating | Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
System | Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str. 34, 85609 Dornach b. München, Germany
Research | Geschäftsführer: Jochen Polster, Thomas M. McCoy, Giuliano Meroni
Center | Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis München
(OSRC) | Registergericht München, HRB Nr. 43632
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists