[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090310125007.GD11935@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:50:07 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Ozan Çağlayan <ozan@...dus.org.tr>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: suggest running a 64bit kernel on LM capable machines with plenty memory.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:37:08AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 20:15 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > How about we do the below as well?
> >
> > Idea looks good, but with your patch it would print two conflicting
> > messages ("use highmem64. No, use 64bit instead"), wouldn't it?
> > Only one would be better.
>
> Something like the below?
Looks good from the logic. Only nit would be missing grepability.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists