[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090310150841.GB8579@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:08:41 +0100
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] fs: introduce mnt_clone_write
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 08:55:58AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 03:38:01PM +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mnt_clone_write);
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mnt_want_write_file);
>
> You don't add any users of these functions in this patch ... is there a
> good reason to export them?
Only to encourage modular code to use them (as a replacement for
mnt_want_write -- which itself is exported).
If that's not the right way to go, I don't mind waiting for a
user to turn up.
[I see many ioctls in btrfs (coming first in the alphabet) could
probably easily use mnt_want_write_file (otoh probably none are
so performance critical).]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists