linux-kernel - Re: PROBLEM: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:3002!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:29:24 -0400
From:	"Alan D. Brunelle" <Alan.Brunelle@...com>
To:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	cl@...ux-foundation.org, penberg@...helsinki.fi, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:3002!

Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 11:16 -0400, Alan D. Brunelle wrote:
>> Running blktrace & I/O loads cause a kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:3002!.
> 
> Pid: 11346, comm: blktrace Tainted: G    B      2.6.29-rc7 #3 ProLiant
> DL585 G5   
> 
> That 'B' there indicates you've hit 'bad page' before this. That bug
> seems to be strongly correlated with some form of hardware trouble.
> Unfortunately, that makes everything after that point a little suspect.


/If/ it were a hardware issue, that might explain the subsequent issue
when I switched to SLUB instead...

How does one look for "bad page reports"?

I /will/ go back and change mm/slab.c as suggested - that will help some
I'm sure (and switch back to SLAB, of course).

> 
> Both this slab BUG and the bad page issue are "shouldn't happen"
> situations that are generally caused by memory changing out from under
> the subsystem, either by some other code scribbling on the relevant
> memory or DRAM trouble or the like. If you want to pursue this further,
> please gather up a collection of any bad page reports you can find on
> your system and change the BUG code at slab.c:3002 to read something
> like:
> 
> 	if (slabp->inuse < 0 || slabp->inuse >= cachep->num) {
> 		printk("SLAB: slabp %p inuse %d max %d\n",
> 			slabp, slabp->inuse, cachep->num);
> 		BUG();
> 	}
> 
> We might find that the slab and the bad page are the same page or
> nearby. We might find that inuse has a single bit flipped (hardware
> error). Or we might find that it has a revealing value scribbled over it
> that points to the culprit. From your trace, it appears to contain 0x70,
> which is a rather large number of objects to have on a slab but as we
> don't know what slab it is, it's hard to say what happened.
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/