[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49B6B821.5050302@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:57:37 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for March 10 (crypto & NLATTR)
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20090306:
>
>
> The driver-core tree gained a build failure due to a conflict with the
> crypto tree. I have applied a patch to the crypto tree for today.
I had several (4 of 50) randconfig builds fail with:
lib/built-in.o: In function `__nla_reserve_nohdr':
(.text+0xd08d): undefined reference to `skb_put'
lib/built-in.o: In function `__nla_reserve':
(.text+0xd121): undefined reference to `skb_put'
lib/built-in.o: In function `nla_append':
(.text+0xd493): undefined reference to `skb_put'
which happens with CONFIG_NET=n, CONFIG_CRYPTO=y, CONFIG_CRYPTO_ZLIB=[my].
CRYPTO_ZLIB selects NLATTR, but obviously the build of nlattr.c fails
when CONFIG_NET=n. Should CRYPTO_ZLIB depend on NET?
Please don't say that CRYPTO_ZLIB should select NET.
--
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists