lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:57:37 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for March 10 (crypto & NLATTR)

Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Changes since 20090306:
> 
> 
> The driver-core tree gained a build failure due to a conflict with the
> crypto tree.  I have applied a patch to the crypto tree for today.

I had several (4 of 50) randconfig builds fail with:

lib/built-in.o: In function `__nla_reserve_nohdr':
(.text+0xd08d): undefined reference to `skb_put'
lib/built-in.o: In function `__nla_reserve':
(.text+0xd121): undefined reference to `skb_put'
lib/built-in.o: In function `nla_append':
(.text+0xd493): undefined reference to `skb_put'

which happens with CONFIG_NET=n, CONFIG_CRYPTO=y, CONFIG_CRYPTO_ZLIB=[my].

CRYPTO_ZLIB selects NLATTR, but obviously the build of nlattr.c fails
when CONFIG_NET=n.  Should CRYPTO_ZLIB depend on NET?
Please don't say that CRYPTO_ZLIB should select NET.


-- 
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ