[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0903092109460.19207@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 21:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jesper Krogh <jesper@...gh.cc>
cc: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.29-rc6
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Jesper Krogh wrote:
>
> First boot.
> [ 0.000000] ref_freq: 2311825 pit_freq: 2310386
> Second boot:
> [ 0.000000] ref_freq: 2311803 pit_freq: 2310190
> Third boot:
> [ 0.000000] ref_freq: 2311824 pit_freq: 2310080
> Fourth boot:
> [ 0.000000] ref_freq: 2311831 pit_freq: 2310130
It's really quite impressively stable, but the fast-PIT calibration
frequency is reliably about 3/4 of a promille low. Or, put another way,
the TSC difference over the pit calibration is just a _tad_ too small
compared to the value we'd expect if that loop of pit_expect_msb() would
really run at the expected delay of a 1.193182MHz clock divided by 256.
And it's stable in that it really always seems to be off by a very similar
amount. It's not moving around very much.
I also wonder why it seems to happen mainly just to _you_. There's
absolutely nothing odd in your system, neither a slow CPU or anything
else that would stand out.
Grr. Very annoyingly non-obvious.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists