linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/10] PM: Rework handling of interrupts during suspend-resume (rev. 5)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0903111106450.29264@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:33:01 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc:	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>,
	Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/10] PM: Rework handling of interrupts during suspend-resume
 (rev. 5)

Rafael,

On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/irq/pm.c
> ===================================================================
> --- /dev/null
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/irq/pm.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
> +/*
> + * linux/kernel/irq/pm.c
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2009 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>, Novell Inc.
> + *
> + * This file contains power management functions related to interrupts.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +
> +#include "internals.h"
> +
> +/**
> + * suspend_device_irqs - disable all currently enabled interrupt lines
> + *
> + * During system-wide suspend or hibernation device interrupts need to be
> + * disabled at the chip level and this function is provided for this purpose.
> + * It disables all interrupt lines that are enabled at the moment and sets the
> + * IRQ_SUSPENDED flag for them.
> + */
> +void suspend_device_irqs(void)
> +{
> +	struct irq_desc *desc;
> +	int irq;
> +
> +	for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc) {
> +		unsigned long flags;
> +		bool sync = false;
> +
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
> +
> +		if (desc->action && !(desc->action->flags & IRQF_TIMER)) {
> +			if (!desc->depth++) {
> +				desc->status |= IRQ_DISABLED;
> +				desc->chip->disable(irq);
> +				sync = true;
> +			}
> +			desc->status |= IRQ_SUSPENDED;

  This flag needs to be checked in __enable_irq().

> +		}
> +
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
> +
> +		if (sync)
> +			synchronize_irq(irq);
> +	}
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(suspend_device_irqs);

  I'm not too enthusiastic about this open coded implementation of
  disable_irq() with slightly different semantics.

  Can we please move the fiddling with desc->* into
  kernel/irq/manage.c and share the code there ?

> +/**
> + * resume_device_irqs - enable interrupt lines disabled by suspend_device_irqs()
> + *
> + * Enable all interrupt lines previously disabled by suspend_device_irqs() that
> + * have the IRQ_SUSPENDED flag set.
> + */
> +void resume_device_irqs(void)
> +{
> +	struct irq_desc *desc;
> +	int irq;
> +
> +	for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc) {
> +		unsigned long flags;
> +
> +		if (!(desc->status & IRQ_SUSPENDED))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
> +		desc->status &= ~IRQ_SUSPENDED;
> +		__enable_irq(desc, irq);
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
> +	}
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(resume_device_irqs);

  Ditto.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/