linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: use list.h for vma list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:52:10 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc:	Daniel Lowengrub <lowdanie@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: use list.h for vma list


* Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:55:48AM +0200, Daniel Lowengrub wrote:
> > Use the linked list defined list.h for the list of vmas that's stored
> > in the mm_struct structure.  Wrapper functions "vma_next" and
> > "vma_prev" are also implemented.  Functions that operate on more than
> > one vma are now given a list of vmas as input.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lowengrub
> 
> That's not how S-o-b line should look like.
> 
> > --- linux-2.6.28.7.vanilla/arch/alpha/kernel/osf_sys.c
> > +++ linux-2.6.28.7/arch/alpha/kernel/osf_sys.c
> > @@ -1197,7 +1197,7 @@
> >  		if (!vma || addr + len <= vma->vm_start)
> >  			return addr;
> >  		addr = vma->vm_end;
> > -		vma = vma->vm_next;
> > +		vma = vma_next(vma);
> 
> Well, this bloats both mm_struct and vm_area_struct.

here's some hard numbers from an earlier submission:

| I made a script that runs 'time ./mmap-perf' 100 times and 
| outputs the average.
|
| The output on the standard kernel was:
|
|   real: 1.022600
|   user: 0.135900
| system: 0.852600
|
| The output after the patch was:
|
|   real: 0.815400
|   user: 0.113200
| system: 0.622200

Which is a 25% speedup in MM performance - which looks very 
significant.

Note: i have not repeated the measurements, and it still looks a 
bit too good - i'd have expected if there's such a low hanging 
25% fruit in the MM we'd have fixed it already.

( Daniel - please preserve such measurements in changelogs. )

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/