linux-kernel - Re: [git-pull -tip V2] x86: cpu architecture debug code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:13:21 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git-pull -tip V2] x86: cpu architecture debug code

* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:

> * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > @@ -472,7 +473,7 @@ static void print_dt(void *seq)
> >  	print_desc_ptr("GDT", seq, dt);
> >  
> >  	/* LDT */
> > -	store_ldt(ldt);
> > +	asm volatile("sldt %0" : "=m" (ldt));
> 
> this is still wrong.

As i pointed it out before, we should not open-code an assembly 
primitive - especially since store_ldt() is available in 
arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h.

True, that primitive is not available on CONFIG_PARAVIRT, but 
that is a bug: the fix is to move the store_ldt() definition 
outside the CONFIG_PARAVIRT section in desc.h, not to hack 
around the problem by open-coding assembly code.

I.e. dont let an uncleanliness and incomplete primitive spread 
to other code. Fix the primitive and remove the uncleanliness 
that way.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/