linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] tracing: use raw spinlocks for trace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0903110956190.16494@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:57:48 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] tracing: use raw spinlocks for trace_vprintk


On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 21:26 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> 
> > commit 80370cb758e7ca2692cd9fb5e413d970b1f4b2b2
> > Author: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
> > Date:   Tue Mar 10 17:16:35 2009 -0400
> > 
> >     tracing: use raw spinlocks for trace_vprintk
> >     
> >     Impact: prevent locking up by lockdep tracer
> >     
> >     The lockdep tracer uses trace_vprintk and thus trace_vprintk can not
> >     call back into lockdep without locking up.
> 
> Hmm, I did this when I posted the lockdep tracepoints, so someone then
> did a bad copy/paste job when renaming ftrace_printk or something?
> 
> See efed792d6738964f399a508ef9e831cd60fa4657
> 
> >     Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> > index 8c6a902..4c97947 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> > @@ -1176,7 +1176,8 @@ void trace_graph_return(struct ftrace_graph_ret *trace)
> >   */
> >  int trace_vprintk(unsigned long ip, int depth, const char *fmt, va_list args)
> >  {
> > -	static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(trace_buf_lock);
> > +	static raw_spinlock_t trace_buf_lock =
> > +		(raw_spinlock_t)__RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
> >  	static u32 trace_buf[TRACE_BUF_SIZE];
> >  
> >  	struct ring_buffer_event *event;
> > @@ -1201,7 +1202,9 @@ int trace_vprintk(unsigned long ip, int depth, const char *fmt, va_list args)
> >  	if (unlikely(atomic_read(&data->disabled)))
> >  		goto out;
> >  
> > -	spin_lock_irqsave(&trace_buf_lock, flags);
> > +	/* Lockdep uses trace_printk for lock tracing */
> > +	local_irq_save(flags);
> 
> Shouldn't you also use raw_local_irq_save() and friends?

I found that the raw_local_irq_save() causes a lot more headaches with 
lockdep complaining that irqs are disabled and it did not know about it. 
Those checks seem everywhere, so I only use the raw_local_irq_save when I 
absolutely need to. Here, it works without it.

-- Steve


> 
> > +	__raw_spin_lock(&trace_buf_lock);
> >  	len = vbin_printf(trace_buf, TRACE_BUF_SIZE, fmt, args);
> >  
> >  	if (len > TRACE_BUF_SIZE || len < 0)
> > @@ -1220,7 +1223,8 @@ int trace_vprintk(unsigned long ip, int depth, const char *fmt, va_list args)
> >  	ring_buffer_unlock_commit(tr->buffer, event);
> >  
> >  out_unlock:
> > -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&trace_buf_lock, flags);
> > +	__raw_spin_unlock(&trace_buf_lock);
> > +	local_irq_restore(flags);
> >  
> >  out:
> >  	ftrace_preempt_enable(resched);
> > 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/