lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:21:26 +0000
From:	Will Newton <will.newton@...il.com>
To:	Wolfgang Mües <wolfgang.mues@...rswald.de>
Cc:	Pierre Ossman <drzeus@...eus.cx>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
	David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] mmc_spi: support for non-byte-aligned cards

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Wolfgang Mües
<wolfgang.mues@...rswald.de> wrote:
> Will,
>
> Am Mittwoch, 11. März 2009 schrieb Will Newton:
>> I have not seen these problems or seen them reported by others.
>
> Yes, it is hard to believe that such a design error is present in today SD
> cards. But spi mode is used only by some devices which do not have a SD host
> controller on board.

I have found some older cards that do not work well with SPI mode, but
I had written of these as ancient relics (128Mb or less in capacity).
I was under the impression that more mobile devices are using SPI mode
these days so SPI mode was becoming more of a priority for
manufacturers.

> I know a commercial FAT/SD card software package, and I found that inside
> their spi driver, there is support for non-byte-aligned cards too. So I am
> not the only one who has knowlegde about this problem.
>
> Should I send you one of these cards so you can verify this problem?

I would be interested to know the manufacturer and model number of a
couple of examples certainly, that way hopefully the test would be
truly independent.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ