[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090311164951.GA29991@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:49:51 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] make dequeue_task less confusing
* David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com> wrote:
> The dequeue_patch function in kernel/sched.c is complicated by
> including a sleep parameter. This parameter is always zero
> except in one instance. This patch clarifies the task of
> dequeue_patch by removing the sleep parameter and moving the
> code that handles non-zero sleep to that one place where it is
> needed.
> --- linux-2.6.27.19/kernel/sched.c 2009-02-21 09:09:34.000000000 +1030
> +++ linux-2.6.27.19/kernel/sched.c.dn 2009-03-12 01:01:48.000000000 +1030
The patch does not apply cleanly to the latest scheduler tree:
1 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file kernel/sched.c
You can find it at:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists