lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090311164951.GA29991@elte.hu>
Date:	Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:49:51 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] make dequeue_task less confusing


* David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com> wrote:

> The dequeue_patch function in kernel/sched.c is complicated by 
> including a sleep parameter.  This parameter is always zero 
> except in one instance.  This patch clarifies the task of 
> dequeue_patch by removing the sleep parameter and moving the 
> code that handles non-zero sleep to that one place where it is 
> needed.

> --- linux-2.6.27.19/kernel/sched.c	2009-02-21 09:09:34.000000000 +1030
> +++ linux-2.6.27.19/kernel/sched.c.dn	2009-03-12 01:01:48.000000000 +1030

The patch does not apply cleanly to the latest scheduler tree:

  1 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file kernel/sched.c

You can find it at:

  http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ