| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:19:44 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> To: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com> CC: Gabor Juhos <juhosg@...nwrt.org>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for March 6 (ath9k) John W. Linville wrote: > On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 11:41:02AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> Gabor Juhos wrote: >>> Randy Dunlap írta: >>>> Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> Linus' release of -rc7 seems to have stirred people up a bit ... >>>>> >>>>> Changes since 20090305: >>>> when CONFIG_RFKILL=n, ath9k/virtual.c causes: >>>> >>>> (.text+0x224e83): undefined reference to `ath_radio_disable' >>>> (.text+0x224e8b): undefined reference to `ath_radio_enable' >>>> >>>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have submitted a patch for this already: >>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=123633468314970&w=2 >>> >>> Should I send it to somewhere else as well? >> It hasn't propagated into the linux-next merging yet... > > He just sent it today (or overnight). I'll get it into wireless-next. > > John > > P.S. I'm starting to think that RFKILL should just be mandatory... This build error still happens in linux-next-20090311. -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists