linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] PCI fixes for 2.6.29

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:48:34 -0600
From:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] PCI fixes for 2.6.29

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 01:36:05PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> please don't use that one. and use "pci: don't disable too many HT MSI
> mapping -v4" instead

I already said I'm not comfortable applying a patch that intrusive at
this stage of -rc7.  I don't understand it nearly well enough, and given
that v1 ended up *not* solving the problem, and neither did v2 or v3,
I'm not convinced you understand it well enough either.  I think v4 is
appropriate for applying during the 2.6.30 merge window.

If you can find someone who really does understand it to review it and
agree it's OK for a post-rc7 merge, I'll consider changing my mind.

-- 
Matthew Wilcox				Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/