[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090311043431.GB25746@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:34:31 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@...el.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
"jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org" <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 4/7] PCI: add SR-IOV API for Physical Function
driver
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 09:37:53AM +0800, Yu Zhao wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 03:39:01AM +0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 04:25:05PM +0800, Yu Zhao wrote:
> > > > > + pci_device_add(virtfn, virtfn->bus);
> > > >
> > > > Greg is probably going to ding you here for adding the device, then
> > > > creating the symlinks. I believe it's now best practice to create the
> > > > symlinks first, so there's no window where userspace can get confused.
> > >
> > > Yes, but unfortunately we can't create links before adding a device.
> > > I double checked device_add(), there is no place for those links to be
> > > created before it sends uevent. So for now, we have to trigger another
> > > uevent for those links.
> >
> > What exactly are you trying to do with a symlink here that you need to
> > do it this way? I vaguely remember you mentioning this in the past, but
> > I thought you had dropped the symlinks after our conversation about this
> > very problem.
>
> I'd like to create some symlinks to reflect the relationship between
> Physical Function and its associated Virtual Functions. The Physical
> Function is like a master device that controls the allocation of its
> Virtual Functions and owns the device physical resource. The Virtual
> Functions are like slave devices of the Physical Function. For example,
> if 01:00.0 is a Physical Function and 02:00.0 is a Virtual Function
> associated with 01:00.0. Then the symlinks (virtfnN and physfn) would
> look like:
>
> $ ls -l /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:01:00.0/
> ...
> ... virtfn0 -> ../0000:02:00.0
> ... virtfn1 -> ../0000:02:00.1
> ... virtfn2 -> ../0000:02:00.2
> ...
>
> $ ls -l /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:02:00.0/
> ...
> ... physfn -> ../0000:01:00.0
> ...
>
> This is very useful for userspace applications, both KVM and Xen need
> to know this kind of relationship so they can request the permission
> from a Physical Function before using its associated Virtual Functions.
Ok, but then make sure you never rely on a udev rule or notifier to see
these symlinks when the device is added to the kernel, as there will be
a nice race condition there :)
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists