linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/5] add softlimit to res

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:14:19 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
	"kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/5] add softlimit to res_counter

On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:40:38 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> Correct me if I am wrong, but this boils down to checking if the top
> root is above it's soft limit? 

  Level_1    soft limit=400M
    Level_2  soft limit=200M
      Level_3  no soft limit
      Level_3  softlimit=100M
    Level_2  soft limit=200M
    Level_2  soft limit=200M

When checking Level3, we need to check Level_2 and Level_1.


> Instead of checking all the way up in
> the hierarchy, can't we do a conditional check for
> 
>         c->parent == NULL && (c->softlimit < c->usage)
> 
> BTW, I would prefer to split the word softlimit to soft_limit, it is
> more readable that way.
> 
Ok, it will give me tons of HUNK but will do ;)

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/