| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20090312133949.130b20ed.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:39:49 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> To: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>, "kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] memcg softlimit (Another one) v4 On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:16:47 +0530 Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> [2009-03-12 09:52:47]: > I've tested so far by > > Creating two cgroups and then > > a. Assigning limits of 1G and 2G and run memory allocation and touch > test softlimit ? > b. Same as (a) with 1G and 1G > c. Same as (a) with 0 and 1G > d. Same as (a) with 0 and 0 > > More comments in induvidual patches. > Then, 1. what's the number of active threads ? 2. what's the number of cpus ? 3. what's the numa configuration, if numa ? 4. what's the zone configuration ? 5. what's arch ? 6. what's amount of total memory ? 7. Do you find difference in behavior with and without softlimit ? 8. Do you tested *this* version ? Thanks, -Kame > -- > Balbir > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists