[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1236849134.5090.26.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:12:14 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:perfcounters/core] perfcounters: IRQ and NMI support on
AMD CPUs
On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 02:44 +0100, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 05.03.09 17:27:29, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Commit-ID: b0f3f28e0f14eb335f67bfaae33ce8b8d74fd58b
> > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/b0f3f28e0f14eb335f67bfaae33ce8b8d74fd58b
> > Author: "Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> > AuthorDate: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:08:27 +0100
> > Commit: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> > CommitDate: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:25:16 +0100
> >
> > perfcounters: IRQ and NMI support on AMD CPUs
> >
> > The below completes the K7+ performance counter support:
> >
> > - IRQ support
> > - NMI support
> >
> > KernelTop output works now as well.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> > Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> > LKML-Reference: <1236273633.5187.286.camel@...top>
> > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> >
> >
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c | 272 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 files changed, 228 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
> > index 3b65f19..6ebe9ab 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
>
> [...]
>
> > @@ -205,18 +243,24 @@ static u64 pmc_intel_save_disable_all(void)
> >
> > static u64 pmc_amd_save_disable_all(void)
> > {
> > - int idx;
> > - u64 val, ctrl = 0;
> > + struct cpu_hw_counters *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_counters);
> > + int enabled, idx;
> > +
> > + enabled = cpuc->enabled;
> > + cpuc->enabled = 0;
> > + barrier();
>
> Peter,
>
> please add comments to all barrier()s you added to this file. Is it
> sufficient in hw_perf_save_disable() to stop NMI's only on the current
> core?
Yes, counters are fundamentally per cpu. But you're right, I'll go
through the code and add comments and fix up some barriers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists