[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1236852816.5090.117.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:13:36 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] futex: unlock before returning -EFAULT
On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 00:56 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> futex_lock_pi can potentially return -EFAULT with the rt_mutex held. This
> seems like the wrong thing to do as userspace should assume -EFAULT means the
> lock was not taken. Even if it could figure this out, we'd be leaving the
> pi_state->owner in an inconsistent state. This patch unlocks the rt_mutex
> prior to returning -EFAULT to userspace.
lockdep would complain, one is not to leave the kernel with locks held.
> Build and boot tested on a 4 way Intel x86_64 workstation. Passes basic
> pthread_mutex and PI tests out of ltp/testcases/realtime.
You keep mentioning these tests.. makes me wonder how much of the futex
code paths they actually test. Got any coverage info on them?
> Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> ---
>
> kernel/futex.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> index 6579912..c980a55 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -1567,6 +1567,13 @@ retry_locked:
> }
> }
>
> + /*
> + * If fixup_pi_state_owner() faulted and was unable to handle the
> + * fault, unlock it and return the fault to userspace.
> + */
> + if (ret && (rt_mutex_owner(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex) == current))
> + rt_mutex_unlock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex);
> +
> /* Unqueue and drop the lock */
> unqueue_me_pi(&q);
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists