[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090311170207.1795cad9.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:02:07 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: dhowells@...hat.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
peterz@...radead.org, Enrik.Berkhan@...com,
uclinux-dev@...inux.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, hannes@...xchg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NOMMU: Pages allocated to a ramfs inode's pagecache may
get wrongly discarded
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:03:02 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > The problem is that the pages are not marked dirty. Anything that creates data
> > in an MMU-based ramfs will cause the pages holding that data will cause the
> > set_page_dirty() aop to be called.
> >
> > For the NOMMU-based mmap, set_page_dirty() may be called by write(), but it
> > won't be called by page-writing faults on writable mmaps, and it isn't called
> > by ramfs_nommu_expand_for_mapping() when a file is being truncated from nothing
> > to allocate a contiguous run.
> >
> > The solution is to mark the pages dirty at the point of allocation by
> > the truncation code.
>
> Page reclaim shouldn't be even attempting to reclaim or write back
> ramfs pagecache pages - reclaim can't possibly do anything with these
> pages!
>
> Arguably those pages shouldn't be on the LRU at all, but we haven't
> done that yet.
>
> Now, my problem is that I can't 100% be sure that we _ever_ implemented
> this properly. I _think_ we did, in which case we later broke it. If
> we've always been (stupidly) trying to pageout these pages then OK, I
> guess your patch is a suitable 2.6.29 stopgap.
OK, I can't find any code anywhere in which we excluded ramfs pages
from consideration by page reclaim. How dumb.
So I guess that for now the proposed patch is suitable. Longer-term we
should bale early in shrink_page_list(), or not add these pages to the
LRU at all.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists