| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:36:20 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/10] PM: Rework handling of interrupts during suspend-resume (rev. 5)
On Wednesday 11 March 2009, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 11 March 2009, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(suspend_device_irqs);
> > > >
> > > > I'm not too enthusiastic about this open coded implementation of
> > > > disable_irq() with slightly different semantics.
> > >
> > > The difference in semantics is important IMO, otherwise I woulndn't have
> > > done that. In particular, IMO, the condition should be under the spinlock IMO
> > > and I'd rather not synchronize all interrupts we don't really disable here.
> >
> > I don't say that the difference is not relevant. But the code is
> > almost the same and disable_irq() could have the sync_irq optimization
> > as well.
>
> Thought more about that. Avoiding the sync_irq() for irqs which have
> no action associated is fine, but you need to catch the following case
> as well:
>
> driver code calls disable_irq_nosyc() from the handler (which is
> still running)
>
> suspend code skips the sync due to depth > 0
>
> The sync operation is not that expensive.
OK, what about this (untested, irrelevant parts skipped)?
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/irq/pm.c
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/irq/pm.c
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+/*
+ * linux/kernel/irq/pm.c
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2009 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>, Novell Inc.
+ *
+ * This file contains power management functions related to interrupts.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+
+#include "internals.h"
+
+/**
+ * suspend_device_irqs - disable all currently enabled interrupt lines
+ *
+ * During system-wide suspend or hibernation device interrupts need to be
+ * disabled at the chip level and this function is provided for this purpose.
+ * It disables all interrupt lines that are enabled at the moment and sets the
+ * IRQ_SUSPENDED flag for them.
+ */
+void suspend_device_irqs(void)
+{
+ struct irq_desc *desc;
+ int irq;
+
+ for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc) {
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
+ __disable_irq(desc, irq, true);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
+ }
+
+ for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc)
+ if (desc->status & IRQ_SUSPENDED)
+ synchronize_irq(irq);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(suspend_device_irqs);
+
+/**
+ * resume_device_irqs - enable interrupt lines disabled by suspend_device_irqs()
+ *
+ * Enable all interrupt lines previously disabled by suspend_device_irqs() that
+ * have the IRQ_SUSPENDED flag set.
+ */
+void resume_device_irqs(void)
+{
+ struct irq_desc *desc;
+ int irq;
+
+ for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc) {
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (!(desc->status & IRQ_SUSPENDED))
+ continue;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
+ __enable_irq(desc, irq, true);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
+ }
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(resume_device_irqs);
+
+/**
+ * check_wakeup_irqs - check if any wake-up interrupts are pending
+ */
+int check_wakeup_irqs(void)
+{
+ struct irq_desc *desc;
+ int irq;
+
+ for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc)
+ if ((desc->status & IRQ_WAKEUP) && (desc->status & IRQ_PENDING))
+ return -EBUSY;
+
+ return 0;
+}
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/irq/Makefile
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/irq/Makefile
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/irq/Makefile
@@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_PROBE) += autop
obj-$(CONFIG_PROC_FS) += proc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ) += migration.o
obj-$(CONFIG_NUMA_MIGRATE_IRQ_DESC) += numa_migrate.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) += pm.o
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/irq/manage.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -162,6 +162,20 @@ static inline int do_irq_select_affinity
}
#endif
+void __disable_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int irq, bool suspend)
+{
+ if (suspend) {
+ if (desc->action && (desc->action->flags & IRQF_TIMER))
+ return;
+ desc->status |= IRQ_SUSPENDED;
+ }
+
+ if (!desc->depth++) {
+ desc->status |= IRQ_DISABLED;
+ desc->chip->disable(irq);
+ }
+}
+
/**
* disable_irq_nosync - disable an irq without waiting
* @irq: Interrupt to disable
@@ -182,10 +196,7 @@ void disable_irq_nosync(unsigned int irq
return;
spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
- if (!desc->depth++) {
- desc->status |= IRQ_DISABLED;
- desc->chip->disable(irq);
- }
+ __disable_irq(desc, irq, false);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(disable_irq_nosync);
@@ -215,15 +226,19 @@ void disable_irq(unsigned int irq)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(disable_irq);
-static void __enable_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int irq)
+void __enable_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int irq, bool resume)
{
+ if (resume)
+ desc->status &= ~IRQ_SUSPENDED;
+
switch (desc->depth) {
case 0:
- WARN(1, KERN_WARNING "Unbalanced enable for IRQ %d\n", irq);
- break;
+ goto err_out;
case 1: {
unsigned int status = desc->status & ~IRQ_DISABLED;
+ if (desc->status & IRQ_SUSPENDED)
+ goto err_out;
/* Prevent probing on this irq: */
desc->status = status | IRQ_NOPROBE;
check_irq_resend(desc, irq);
@@ -232,6 +247,11 @@ static void __enable_irq(struct irq_desc
default:
desc->depth--;
}
+
+ return;
+
+ err_out:
+ WARN(true, KERN_WARNING "Unbalanced enable for IRQ %d\n", irq);
}
/**
@@ -253,7 +273,7 @@ void enable_irq(unsigned int irq)
return;
spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
- __enable_irq(desc, irq);
+ __enable_irq(desc, irq, false);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(enable_irq);
@@ -511,7 +531,7 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq
*/
if (shared && (desc->status & IRQ_SPURIOUS_DISABLED)) {
desc->status &= ~IRQ_SPURIOUS_DISABLED;
- __enable_irq(desc, irq);
+ __enable_irq(desc, irq, false);
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/irq/internals.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/irq/internals.h
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/irq/internals.h
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ extern void compat_irq_chip_set_default_
extern int __irq_set_trigger(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int irq,
unsigned long flags);
+extern void __disable_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int irq, bool susp);
+extern void __enable_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int irq, bool resume);
extern struct lock_class_key irq_desc_lock_class;
extern void init_kstat_irqs(struct irq_desc *desc, int cpu, int nr);
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists