linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] acquire mmap semaphore in pagemap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090312164634.6f2027ac@skybase>
Date:	Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:46:34 +0100
From:	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To:	Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@...-lyon.org>
Cc:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acquire mmap semaphore in pagemap_read.

On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:41:31 +0100
Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@...-lyon.org> wrote:

> > Which would be really ugly. I still have not grasped why this will
> > introduce a deadlock though. The worst the put_user can do is to cause
> > a page fault, no? I do not see where the fault handler acquires the
> > mmap_sem as writer. It takes the mmap_sem as reader and two readers
> > should be fine.
> 
> Somebody else can acquire for write in the meantime, for instance
> another thread doing mprotect. This writer is blocked by the first
> reader, and the second reader is blocked by the writer. So both
> tasks are blocked.

I see, fair r/w locks. So nested down_read is a no-no.

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/