[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3aaafc130903121115j2f48d8a4h511dc8a7d9718de7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:15:39 -0400
From: "J.R. Mauro" <jrm8005@...il.com>
To: David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] /dev/time for Linux, inspired by Plan 9
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:00 AM, David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com> wrote:
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Given the general array of current interfaces in the kernel, isn't
>> read/write of textual parameters better suited to sysfs or procfs
>> than a character device?
>
> Procfs and Sysfs are used to control devices. Dev is used to access
> them. Dev is the right place to fetch and set the time; having a text
> interface is beside the point.
I also think we're aiming for compatibility with Plan 9 here, which
keeps this file in /dev
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists