[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0903121510380.21607@qirst.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:12:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch -mm v2] cpusets: add memory_slab_hardwall flag
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, David Rientjes wrote:
> Yes, jobs are running in the leaf with my above example. And it's quite
> possible that the higher level has segmented the machine for NUMA locality
> and then further divided that memory for individual jobs. When a job
> completes or is killed, the slab cache that it has allocated can be freed
> in its entirety with no partial slab fragmentation (i.e. there are no
> objects allocated from its slabs for disjoint, still running jobs). That
> cpuset may then serve another job.
Looks like we are talking about a differing project here. Partial slabs
are shared between all processors with SLUB. Slab shares the partial slabs
for the processors on the same node.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists