[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200903121424.08961.phillips@phunq.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:24:08 -0700
From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@...nq.net>
To: tux3@...3.org
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Tux3] Tux3 report: Tux3 Git tree available
On Thursday 12 March 2009, Andi Kleen wrote:
> to be honest the estimate of adding btree directories in 3kLOC
> of code seems very optimistic.
Is that a bet?
> >> This symbol is only supposed to be shared between separate compilation
> >> units within fs/tux3, not be visible outside our module. How do we do
> >> that?
> >
> > You can't. Bear in mind that we want the allyesconfig kernel to link
> > and run, and that includes tux3. So do it manually by prefixing
> > everything with tux3_ or whatever. (does it need the "3"?)
>
> AFAIK it could be done by using special linker scripts for the sublinks.
> But I'm not sure it's worth it because that would require listing of the symbols
> in some file. Would need some Makefile magic.
>
> For modules I also had the "namespace" patches some time ago which implemented
> simple namespace support. Should probably resurrect that.
Per-module name scope would be a nice creature comfort. Well, for now
the offending names will just get tux_ed.
Regards,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists