linux-kernel - Re: [stable] [Bug #12766] Lots of smp_processor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090313055654.GC11965@kroah.com>
Date:	Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:56:54 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Tilman Schmidt <t.schmidt@...enixsoftware.de>
Cc:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stable Kernel <stable@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [stable] [Bug #12766] Lots of smp_processor_id() in
	preemptible messages

On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 07:03:06PM +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge schrieb:
> >>
> >> Bug-Entry    : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12766
> >> Subject        : Lots of smp_processor_id() in preemptible messages
> >> Submitter    : Tilman Schmidt <t.schmidt@...enixsoftware.de>
> >> Date        : 2009-02-23 18:37 (1 days old)
> >> References    : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123541536414019&w=4
> > 
> > Looks like stable needs to pick up 
> > d85cf93da66977dbc645352be1b2084a659d8a0b.
> 
> I can confirm that commit d85cf93da66977dbc645352be1b2084a659d8a0b applied to 2.6.28.7 fixes this.

Now queued up in 2.6.28-stable
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/