linux-kernel - Re: make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49BA02E4.3080208@snapgear.com>
Date:	Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:53:24 +1000
From:	Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
CC:	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dwmw2@...radead.org,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7.


Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 22:02, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
>>> And, yes, I can confirm the m68k include/asm/unistd.h from linux-next actually
>>> has contents, thanks to commit 646652bded41f4c3bd375b4e03a25b42da93f40b
>>>
>>> Anyway, here's hoping the fix makes it into 2.6.29.
>> Why not telling the m68k maintainer that you think it should go into 2.6.29?
>>
>> As it stand now we will ikely see another mail from you "I already said so"
>> when we ship it broken but you did not care to tell relevant people.
>>
>> grep -C 5 -i m68k MAINTAINES revelas this:
>> M68K ARCHITECTURE
>> P:      Geert Uytterhoeven
>> M:      geert@...ux-m68k.org
>> P:      Roman Zippel
>> M:      zippel@...ux-m68k.org
>> L:      linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org
>> W:      http://www.linux-m68k.org/
>> W:      http://linux-m68k-cvs.ubb.ca/
>> S:      Maintained
>>
>>
>>        Sam
>>
> 
> There are a few more:
> 
> param.h:#include "param_no.h"
> param.h:#include "param_mm.h"
> ptrace.h:#include "ptrace_no.h"
> ptrace.h:#include "ptrace_mm.h"
> setup.h:#include "setup_no.h"
> setup.h:#include "setup_mm.h"
> sigcontext.h:#include "sigcontext_no.h"
> sigcontext.h:#include "sigcontext_mm.h"
> siginfo.h:#include "siginfo_no.h"
> siginfo.h:#include "siginfo_mm.h"
> signal.h:#include "signal_no.h"
> signal.h:#include "signal_mm.h"
> swab.h:#include "swab_no.h"
> swab.h:#include "swab_mm.h"
> 
> Rob, do these also causes problems?
> Some (not all) of them are fixed in linux-next.

My patches in linux-next (from the m68knommu git tree) should
fix all but sigconext and signal in that list.

Both of those are relatively easy to fix up. I'll do that.

Regards
Greg


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer  --  Principal Engineer        EMAIL:     gerg@...pgear.com
SnapGear, a McAfee Company                  PHONE:       +61 7 3435 2888
825 Stanley St,                             FAX:         +61 7 3891 3630
Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia         WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/