[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1236930985.5188.77.camel@laptop>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:56:25 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
uClinux development list <uclinux-dev@...inux.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] RE: [PATCH] NOMMU: Pages allocated to a ramfs
inode's pagecache may get wrongly discarded
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 08:20 +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > Does the vm pageout logic include or skip these "dirty" pages looking
> > > for candidates to flush to storage? What about with MMU?
> >
> > Includes them, regular pageout will try to do the writeout to clean them
> > and then discard them.
> >
> > The ramfs stuff is rather icky in that it adds the pages to the aging
> > list, marks them dirty, but does not provide a writeout method.
> >
> > This will make the paging code scan over them (continuously) trying to
> > clean them, failing that (lack of writeout method) and putting them back
> > on the list.
>
> It ins't true any more.
> UNEVICTABLE_LRU will move ramfs's page from LRU to unevictable list.
> Couldn't we solve this problem if NOMMU can support CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU ?
That's more of a band-aid than a solution, no? They should never have
been on the list to begin with.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists