linux-kernel - Re: [uClinux-dev] RE: [PATCH] NOMMU: Pages allocated to a ramfs inode's pagecache may get wrongly discarded

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <28c262360903130217u4ebbc80ct6d857acd768f2eda@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:17:05 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
	uClinux development list <uclinux-dev@...inux.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] RE: [PATCH] NOMMU: Pages allocated to a ramfs 
	inode's pagecache may get wrongly discarded

On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 08:20 +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
>
>> > > Does the vm pageout logic include or skip these "dirty" pages looking
>> > > for candidates to flush to storage?  What about with MMU?
>> >
>> > Includes them, regular pageout will try to do the writeout to clean them
>> > and then discard them.
>> >
>> > The ramfs stuff is rather icky in that it adds the pages to the aging
>> > list, marks them dirty, but does not provide a writeout method.
>> >
>> > This will make the paging code scan over them (continuously) trying to
>> > clean them, failing that (lack of writeout method) and putting them back
>> > on the list.
>>
>> It ins't true any more.
>> UNEVICTABLE_LRU will move ramfs's page from LRU to unevictable list.
>> Couldn't we solve this problem if NOMMU can support CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU ?
>
> That's more of a band-aid than a solution, no? They should never have
> been on the list to begin with.
>

I agree as Andrew pointed out.
It may be workaround but can be a good solution in current status.
And then, we have to improve it for removal of ramfs pages from lru
list in future, I think.

-- 
Kinds regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/