[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49BA7810.6090807@goop.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:13:20 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 10/24] xen: mask XSAVE from cpuid
Jan Beulich wrote:
> As pointed out on an earlier thread, it seems inappropriate to do probing
> like this when there is a cpuid feature flag (osxsave) that can be used to
> determine whether XSAVE can be used. And even without that flag,
> simply reading CR4 and checking whether osxsave is set there would
> suffice. This is under the assumption that Xen's to-be-done implementation
> of XSAVE support would match that of FXSAVE (Xen turns its support on
> unconditionally and for all [pv] guests).
I didn't want to make too many assumptions about how Xen's XSAVE support
would look. In particular, I thought it might virtualize the state of
OSXSAVE to give the guest the honour of appearing to enable it. A guest
kernel may get confused if it starts with OSXSAVE set, as it may use it
to control its own init logic.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists