[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090313163702.GA9082@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:37:02 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@...gle.com>,
Martin Bligh <mbligh@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] tracing/x86: basic implementation of syscall
tracing for x86-64
* Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca> wrote:
> * Frederic Weisbecker (fweisbec@...il.com) wrote:
>
> > Provide the ptrace hooks and arch specific syscall numbers
> > to ftrace arch indepedant syscall numbers. For now it only
> > supports 4 syscalls to provide an example.
> >
>
> Hi Frederic,
>
> I already have the equivalent TIF_KERNEL_TRACE flag in my
> LTTng tree added to every Linux architecture. You might want
> to re-use this work rather than re-doing this. I don't mind
> changing the flag name.
Yeah. Note that the TIF bits are just one part - there are other
bits needed for HAVE_FTRACE_SYSCALLS arch support.
Also, i'd eventually expect the TIF bits to be converted to a
tracehook callback, not spread it to other architectures.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists