linux-kernel - Re: [ipw3945-devel] X200 suspend status on -wl and -next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:01:06 -0700
From:	reinette chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To:	Nico -telmich- Schottelius 
	<nico-linux-ipw3945-devel@...ottelius.org>
Cc:	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090311@...ottelius.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"ipw3945-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
	<ipw3945-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ipw3945-devel] X200 suspend status on -wl and -next

On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 01:00 -0700, Nico -telmich- Schottelius wrote:
> reinette chatre [Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:32:22AM -0700]:
> > On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 10:30 -0700, John W. Linville wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 03:20:03PM +0100, Nico -telmich- Schottelius wrote:
> > > > John W. Linville [Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 02:44:07PM -0400]:
> > > > > Any chance you'd like to try wireless-testing to help to isolate
> > > > > possible sources of this problem?
> > > > > 
> > > > > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-testing.git
> > > > 
> > > > v2.6.29-rc7-17155-g2f7ab92 looks good (as in: wlan works after several
> > > > suspends and resumes). But it seems you do not add the full kernel version:
> > > > 
> > > > sgnx20002:/home/nico/wireless-testing# git describe
> > > > v2.6.29-rc7-17155-g2f7ab92
> > > > sgnx20002:/home/nico/wireless-testing# uname -r
> > > > 2.6.29-rc7-wl-ikn
> > > > 
> > > > Which is the kernel built some seconds before.
> > > 
> > > I don't know where you get the -ikn bits from, presumably from the
> > > iwlwifi project.  Given what you said above, it would seem you are
> > > getting your suspend/resume problems from them as well... :-(
> > 
> > In our repo we do not add anything to the value of localversion. We also
> > track wireless-testing _very_ closely so the differences are at most a
> > handful of patches. Could you please send me commit id of iwlwifi-2.6
> > repo that fails as well as the commit id of wireless-testing repo that
> > succeeds?
> 
> As I did before in this thread:
> 
>   vmlinuz-2.6.29-rc7-wl-ikn-32831-g98c5597 from iwlwifi-2.6: fails
>   2.6.29-rc7-wl-ikn or v2.6.29-rc7-17155-g2f7ab92 from wireless-testing: works

I am sorry that I missed this information in the thread.

> 
> Btw, I'm running 2.6.29-rc7-next-20090306-ikn currently, which also looks good.

Your wireless-testing repository tested is much newer than the
iwlwifi-2.6 one ... new patches for our driver is in your
wireless-testing repo but not in iwlwifi-2.6. So, in your testing
wireless-testing contains more up to date iwlwifi code than the
iwlwifi-2.6 repo.

Could you please test with today's versions of the two repos? There is a
one small patch difference.

Thank you

Reinette


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/